There are a few sites which have created a business model out of feeding the ‘MBA degree hungry‘ aspirants tidbits of info regarding their prospective schools. They have been constantly gathering info from various sources (authentic or otherwise) and posting it on their sites.
Of course, not to undermine their efforts, they even take the steps to bring in a Dean or a Placement Director here & there and interview him to gain ‘insights’ and pass them on. And the nervous aspirants take in every little thing as if it were their pathway to the school (life?) of their choice.
And not leaving out the roles played by the colleges in this melee, the colleges do put up an attractive front to these sites to reach out to the students. Agreed this is one way of branding the school and creating a positive image in the minds of its customers (or victims). But how do we explain when these sites exhibit their highhandedness and ridicule the colleges for really trivial things, when they assume they are the masters and it is the college’s duty to dance to their tunes. Just because they have the power to reach to people, they magnify small shortcomings of the schools and run the extra mile to etch this negative feeling about the college in the minds of the students (prospective and otherwise). In MBA parlance, is this acceptable in value creation for the whole ecosystem?
This is a classic case of when the fence thinks it is more important than the farm itself!
It will not be long before everyone is put back into his/her place!
P.S: If u are an ex/present/future MBA aspirant and are following the right site & not leaving out the important posts, u should know what I am talking about!